That is not possible, you have to change the message to include a replyTo/sender field.
If the interaction is not performance sensitive you could perhaps introduce an intermediate classic actor which puts sender()
in a field in a new message.
That is not possible, you have to change the message to include a replyTo/sender field.
If the interaction is not performance sensitive you could perhaps introduce an intermediate classic actor which puts sender()
in a field in a new message.